The Decision-Ready Standard

Most enterprise portfolio data is a patchwork of historical documents, fragmented vendor reports, and internal assumptions. The 413 Standard replaces that variability with field-verified, standardized COPE data captured under a single controlled methodology.

The Industry Status Quo vs. The 413 Standard

Every row represents a gap between how portfolio data is typically collected and how it should be collected when decisions depend on it.

Attribute
Industry Status Quo
The 413 Standard

Verification

Industry Status Quo

Desk reviews, Google Earth, or fragmented third-party networks with no on-site presence.

The 413 Standard

100% on-site verification. Every data point is field-captured by trained technicians at the location.

Methodology

Industry Status Quo

Subcontracted gig networks with varying interpretations, training levels, and capture standards.

The 413 Standard

Single controlled methodology. Internally trained technicians executing one standardized protocol nationwide.

Traceability

Industry Status Quo

Final reports often lack raw verification data, timestamps, or inspector identification.

The 413 Standard

Full traceability. Every attribute tied to a specific visit, technician, timestamp, and GPS coordinate.

Data Output

Industry Status Quo

Summary reports with no raw data access. PDFs that can't be imported into downstream systems.

The 413 Standard

Structured raw data. Full dataset export (CSV, Excel) plus per-site PDF reports with photo documentation.

Custom Attributes

Industry Status Quo

Fixed templates with no flexibility. Custom data requires a separate vendor or internal program.

The 413 Standard

Custom fields at scale. Client-defined attributes deployed across the full portfolio without slowing execution.

The Methodology Behind the Standard

Platform-Enforced Consistency

The capture logic is built into the mobile collection platform — not left to individual inspector judgment. The same standardized workflow runs at every location whether the portfolio is 10 sites or 10,000.

Geographic Execution Integrity

Remote locations receive the same protocol, the same equipment, and the same data quality as primary metro hubs. Pricing does not vary by geography. Quality does not degrade by distance.

Exception Transparency

Locations where captured data falls outside client-defined tolerances are flagged in the deliverable. We surface the outliers — your team decides what to do about them.

Why This Standard Exists

Every stakeholder in the property risk chain — operators, brokers, carriers — makes decisions based on field data. When that data is inconsistent, incomplete, or unverified, every decision downstream inherits the same uncertainty.

For Underwriting

Carrier underwriters price risk based on COPE data. When construction class, roof condition, or protection systems are estimated instead of verified, pricing accuracy suffers and loss ratios drift.

For Submissions

Brokers build placement submissions on the data they have. Field-verified COPE data reduces carrier follow-up questions, accelerates the underwriting process, and improves submission quality.

For Operations

Operators make capital allocation, maintenance, and liability decisions based on site condition data. When that data is three years old or inconsistent across locations, the decisions are too.

For Renewals

Renewal outcomes depend on current, accurate portfolio data. The 413 Standard is designed to align with renewal timelines — delivering verified data before submission deadlines, not after.

The standard your portfolio data should meet — and the methodology to get it there.

What We Collect Start a Conversation